Monitoring Phenol in Water Print
A plant located in the eastern United States manufactures phenolic resin for applications in plastics molding. This plant uses well water for cooling its reaction process and then discharges the water into a local creek.
A leak in the reactor and associated cooling equipment would cause phenol and phenolic compounds to contaminate the cooling water. Such a leak could result in a discharge violation. The local regulators frequently inspected the plant?s discharge to ensure compliance with the discharge permit.
Figure 1: Measured phenol concentration swing corresponds to reactor pressurization swing, thus the TD-4100 detected a leak. (click image to see full sized).
” The TD-4100 detected a leak in the reactor before the discharge limit had been exceeded.”
The company requires on-line monitoring of the cooling water to detect a leak and prevent a discharge violation. Previously the company employed a Technicon analyzer, which used wet chemistry techniques to continuously monitor the phenol in the water. The Technicon analyzer required considerable maintenance due to the wet chemistry method. A replacement monitor was necessary to replace the aging Technicon, which was no longer manufactured nor supported. The replacement analyzer had to be capable of reliably detecting phenol in water below the discharge threshold of 150 ppb. Given the direct discharge of the cooling water into a stream, the local regulators as well as the plant were concerned about the potential discharge of phenol, a toxic compound.
The company chose the Turner Designs Hydrocarbon Instruments TD-4100 as a replacement for the Technicon analyzer. Phenol is an extremely fluorescent compound, therefore the fluorescence-technology TD-4100 was capable of detecting phenol much lower then the required alarm limit of 150 ppb. The actual detection limit of phenol for this application was determined to be between 12.5 to 25 ppb in the cooling water. A potential company concern was the baseline noise of the TD-4100 compared to the old Technicon analyzer, yet this concern was eliminated since both instruments exhibited similar background noise. The instrument drift of the TD-4100 proved to be less than the replaced Technicon.
The company was pleased with the instrument performance, yet the true performance test was verified when the TD-4100 detected a regularly occurring phenol concentration swing in the cooling water. Company personnel initially suspected a problem with the TD-4100, yet the period of the concentration swings identically matched the pressurization cycle of the reactor. Figure 1 shows the regular phenol concentration swing corresponding to the reactor pressurization cycle. The TD-4100 detected a leak in the reactor before the discharge limit had been exceeded. Thus, the TD-4100 prevented a costly discharge violation by allowing the company to detect a small leak before a catastrophic failure.